Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Applications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pataskala meeting approves seven land-use renewal applications
Summary
Pataskala City members approved seven renewal applications for properties from about 22 to nearly 109 acres after staff recommended each for conservation or suburban residential designations; votes were unanimous and the meeting adjourned.
Pataskala City members voted to recommend approval of seven land-use renewal applications on a single agenda, moving forward parcels ranging from roughly 22 acres to nearly 109 acres.
Scott, a staff member, presented each application in turn and told the group that staff had no objections to any of the submissions. For the first application, Scott said, “The first application is for Derek Lee located on Macintosh Road on 22 acres in size.” He said the parcel is zoned agricultural and staff recommended a conservation rural designation. Members moved, seconded and recorded affirmative votes.
Scott presented similar summaries for Wit Acres Limited (72 acres on Cable Road), Whitaker (25 acres on Cable Road), Aircat Limited (about 109 acres on Mil Street), Williams (50 acres on Granville Street), Jacobs (about 75 acres on Columbia Road) and Hoover (about 30.2 acres on East Broad Street). For each, Scott said the properties are zoned agricultural except where noted, and staff recommended conservation rural or conservation suburban (for some parcels) or medium-density residential (Hoover). He told the meeting that staff “have no objection” for each application.
Members signaled support for each recommendation during roll call-style votes. On several items individual members were recorded by name as saying “Yes” while voting; on others the record shows unanimous affirmative responses. No public comments, objections, or staff conditions were recorded in the transcript.
The meeting concluded after members moved to adjourn. The Chair closed the session; members recorded agreement and the meeting was set to reconvene at 6:50 according to the agenda announcement.
The meeting record does not show any formal denials, conditions attached to approvals, or requests for additional information on these applications. No statutes, ordinances, or other legal citations were referenced in the discussion recorded in the transcript.
