Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Form Revision topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council presses to restore comfort language and simplify wording in goals-of-care form

MOLST Advisory Council (Department of Public Health) · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dr. Shapiro urged restoring the phrase 'symptom management for comfort' to each goals-of-care option and council members agreed to make the comfort language prominent and to consider changing the header to 'Goals of care'; staff will update the form and re-record training slides as needed.

The MOLST Advisory Council spent substantial time revising language on the goals-of-care form. Dr. Shapiro said the updated form had removed a line that had previously ended each goal with "symptom management for comfort," and she urged that language be restored.

"Everyone deserves to be comfortable regardless of their goals of care," Dr. Shapiro said, asking the council to reinstate comfort-focused wording. Members debated wording across the three selectable options (full treatment, selective treatment, and comfort-focused treatment) and discussed ways to keep each option concise while still clarifying that all choices include symptom management for comfort.

Suggestions that gained support included placing a short, clear sentence above the selection list (for example, "All selections include symptom management for comfort") to avoid repetitive long lines, and replacing the header "Goals of treatment" with "Goals of care" to align with common parlance. Members also proposed removing the adjective "medical" from phrases like "limitations to medical treatment" to ensure palliative surgical interventions would not be unintentionally excluded.

Council members agreed that training slides explaining the revised language should be re-recorded where necessary; Melia said she would convert the agreed edits into a form and circulate the revised slide for review after the meeting.

The group asked staff to check the form's reading grade level and to circulate draft language for final edits before publication or training re-recording.