Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Remote Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ethics commissioners weigh hybrid attendance, cite quorum and confidentiality limits
Summary
Commissioners discussed permitting members to attend in-person commission meetings remotely under narrow circumstances; staff outlined legal limits (remote attendees do not count toward physical quorum) and logistical challenges for hybrid setups, and commissioners asked staff to research secure options rather than adopt rule changes immediately.
At the same meeting commissioners discussed whether members may attend otherwise in-person Florida Commission on Ethics meetings remotely and asked staff to research hybrid options rather than adopt immediate policy changes.
Executive Director Carrie summarized logistical and operational constraints for hybrid meetings: the commission must publicly notice meetings, record audio, and preserve executive-session confidentiality. Carrie said the commission historically relies on coordinators to provide correct paper mailing addresses for local filers and that the move to electronic filing should reduce some delivery problems but that hybrid participation would require investment in microphones, an "owl" video/hub device, or other equipment to ensure acceptable sound and broadcast quality.
General counsel Zilcowski explained the legal framework under communications-media-technology (CMT) provisions and Office of the Attorney General opinions. He said fully remote meetings by CMT are lawful if access points are provided and quorum rules are met; OAG opinions allow remote attendance to an otherwise in-person meeting for medical treatment, physical infirmity or other "extraordinary circumstances," but remote attendees generally do not count toward the physical quorum. He also said remote executive sessions pose confidentiality risks and therefore are not a recommended practice.
Commissioners raised practical concerns: limited microphone inputs and sound-mixer capacity in the commission's usual meeting space, the availability and accessibility of Senate meeting rooms, potential costs to outfit spaces for hybrid participation, and enforcement or verification measures to ensure a remote attendee's environment is secure when confidentiality is required. Commissioner Lucas urged fairness, noting that any convenience to commissioners should also consider parties who are compelled to appear before the commission.
Several commissioners supported exploring secure remote locations or certification procedures (for example, sworn attestations or verified remote rooms) and asked staff to return with cost estimates and options. No formal policy or rule change was adopted.
Commissioners emphasized that electronic filing and improved coordinator practices may reduce some notice problems staff raised earlier, and several members said technology will likely play a larger role in the future but that staff should present feasible, confidential, and costed options before the commission acts.
