Get email alerts on the Disciplinary Action topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ethics Commission approves $1,000 stipulation in John Stevens case
Summary
The Commission on Ethics adopted a joint stipulation resolving two allegations against John Stevens; Stevens admitted one misuse-of-position allegation and agreed to a $1,000 fine while a second allegation was dismissed for insufficient evidence.
Get email alerts on the Disciplinary Action topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Commission on Ethics voted unanimously by roll call to approve a joint stipulation resolving two allegations against respondent John Stevens, a commissioner with the Cedar Hammock Fire District. Commission advocate Mr. Burns told the panel that Stevens would admit one allegation of misusing his position and pay a $1,000 fine; the other allegation would be dismissed because the evidence did not warrant further proceedings.
Attorney Robinson, representing Stevens, told the commission that Stevens would not appear in person for the proceeding. The commission heard no disclosures and no commissioners requested recusal. After brief confirmation there were no questions, Commissioner L. moved and Commissioner Rogers seconded the motion to adopt the stipulation. Miss Westberry called a roll that recorded six votes in favor and one absence; the motion passed.
Under the commission's rules, a rejected stipulation could have sent the complaint to the Division of Administrative Hearings for an evidentiary hearing; by approving the joint stipulation the commission accepted the admission and imposed the agreed fine. An order adopting the stipulation will be entered in due course.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

