Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Roads Easements topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners postpone decision on East 4th Street alignment pending legal review and traffic counts

York County Board of Commissioners · May 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

York County commissioners discussed a long-used but irregular East 4th Street alignment with mixed ownership and 1909 easements; after extended testimony from the county surveyor and highway superintendent the board voted to postpone action and directed staff to obtain legal analysis and traffic counts.

York County commissioners extensively discussed East 4th Street — a traveled but non‑standard roadway that crosses multiple privately owned parcels and a strip of land recently acquired by the City of York — and agreed on June 14 to postpone any alignment or construction decision until the county obtains legal advice and traffic data.

County surveyor Rex and Highway Superintendent Harvey summarized deed history and field survey findings. The record shows long‑standing easements dating to 1909 that have been used for decades; parts of the west end have been acquired or dedicated by the City of York. Commissioners heard cost estimates to relocate and reconfigure the road (Harvey estimated roughly $140,000–$145,000) and were warned of drainage and maintenance obligations if the road is declared open as a county road.

Board discussion weighed options including (a) declaring the historic travelway a public road under relevant statutes, (b) negotiating easements or acquiring rights from landowners, (c) moving the county road to the quarter‑section line at significant cost, or (d) limiting county work to maintenance of the existing traveled route and acquiring necessary easements. Commissioners asked the county attorney to research statutes on roads opened by public use, and directed staff to perform traffic counts at key points to inform whether the corridor merits county‑standard opening.

The board voted to postpone final action and requested a follow‑up report with legal findings, easement documentation and traffic data before revisiting the item.