Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legal update: Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling narrows and clarifies exceptions to 24-hour agenda rule, council told
Summary
City solicitor/staff explained four exceptions to the Sunshine Acts 24-hour agenda requirement (emergency business, business arising within 24 hours, business arising during a meeting, and adding items by majority vote), emphasizing the separate vote and post‑meeting posting requirements for amended agendas.
Mr. Staples summarized recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court guidance (Coleman v. Parkland School District) and explained how it affects local bodies' agenda procedures.
Staples said the court identified four exceptions to the requirement that an agenda be published 24 hours in advance: emergency business (a real or potential emergency that threatens life or property), business arising within 24 hours of a meeting (which must be de minimis and not involve expenditures or contracts), business arising during a meeting (which may be referred to staff or added if de minimis and not involving expenditures), and adding an item by a majority vote of those present and voting (which is the only exception that requires the amended agenda be posted no later than the first business day after the meeting).
He emphasized that for the latter exception "the reason for the change has to be announced at the meeting before the vote is taken" and that minutes should reflect the substance and reason for any agenda amendment. Council members asked several practical questions about how and when agenda items may be added; Staples repeatedly underlined that the rules are fact‑sensitive and that the separate vote protects public transparency.
No immediate policy changes were adopted; council members discussed continuing current practice and asked staff to keep the rules in mind when planning agenda changes.
