Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Probation Dispatchers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel backs extending probation floor for public safety dispatchers, allows agency extensions

Joint Standing Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety · March 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee amended LD 2090 to ensure a minimum six-month probationary period for public safety dispatchers and to permit employing agencies to extend probation (up to a year) without needing central HR approval, then voted the measure out as amended.

Committee members voted to pass LD 2090 as amended to create uniform minimum probation protections for public-safety dispatchers and to make extensions the responsibility of the employing agency rather than require DAS-level discretionary approval.

Director Michael Abby (Director of Bureau of Communications) summarized conversations with Bureau of Human Resources: state civil-service rules already establish a six-month minimum and permit a discretionary six-month extension, but in practice extensions had rarely been granted. "They cited the civil service rules ... the minimum six months we can extend it to an additional six months at their discretion," Abby reported. Committee members said they wanted statutory clarity to ensure agencies and local employers can negotiate and, where appropriate, extend probation without a DAS-level veto.

Representative Chad Perkins offered the amendment (with friendly changes) to add parity across municipal, county and state sections and to specify that collective-bargaining agreements would govern where they exist. The amendment also clarified that the employing agency head (rather than a central HR director) would make extension determinations for dispatchers. The committee approved the amendment and then voted to report the bill "ought to pass as amended." The roll-call recorded 11 in favor and 2 absent.

The sponsor said he will bring a preemptive draft language review back to the committee before finalization.

Vote: LD 2090 (as amended) — Motion: Ought to pass as amended; Outcome: Approved by roll call (11 yes, 2 absent).