Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and officials raise zoning, solar-field and easement concerns; Outdoor Institute Association gives drainage update
Summary
Board members discussed a proposed solar field and the local special-use and board-of-adjustment process; an executive director for the Outdoor Institute Association updated members on drainage-clerk outreach and said the association's legal counsel provides advisory support, not individual representation. Property owners reported letters from DOT about 'flowage easements' related to the Highway 61 project.
At the May 12 meeting, members discussed local development issues including a proposed solar field, the county's zoning ordinance and how projects proceed to the board of adjustment for special-use exceptions.
The chair raised concerns about large solar fields appearing near residences and noted parts of the application may not meet local ordinance requirements. "Once it goes through board of adjustment, not zoning," the chair said, explaining that applicants seeking special-use exceptions must meet setbacks and other ordinance criteria before local approval. The chair also warned that developers could seek state-level approval if local bodies deny a project.
The meeting included a presentation from the executive director of the Outdoor Institute Association, who described the group's outreach to drainage clerks, summer and annual meetings (July 16 and a December conference), and its use of in-house legal counsel and lobbyists to follow legislation affecting drainage. The director said the association's counsel can advise the membership but cannot legally represent private landowners: "We don't want to be your legal counsel. We want to assist your legal counsel," the director said.
Members also raised a separate concern about letters from the Department of Transportation about "flowage easements" related to the Highway 61 project that landed on property not directly in the construction footprint. A member said DOT told a caller that further details could take about four weeks. Board members asked staff to collect materials and noted the county's staff and legal advisers would review the notices before advising landowners.
The board did not take formal action on zoning or easements at the meeting; members said they would post agendas and coordinate with the board of adjustment and county staff to provide public notice and next steps if an application proceeds to a special-use hearing.
