Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harriman council authorizes negotiations to bring planning services back to East Tennessee Development District
Summary
After debate about contract length and staffing, the Harriman City Council voted to authorize the city manager and city attorney to negotiate a planning-services contract with the East Tennessee Development District, citing the district's staffing and a named planner with 25 years' experience.
HARRIMAN — The Harriman City Council voted to authorize the city manager and city attorney to enter negotiations with the East Tennessee Development District (ETDD) to provide planning services for the city.
The move followed a lengthy discussion in which staff described past service problems under ETDD, the city's subsequent move to Rome County for planning services, and the need for reliable local planning support going forward. Scott Mason said ETDD currently has four planners and identified one potential planner by name: “the gentleman's name is Joseph Barrett. He's got over 25 years in planning,” Mason said.
Council members debated contract length and transition timing. Mason said the county interlocal agreement this year was $14,666 and proposed prorating a contract that could begin in February and be formalized in July; several council members asked staff to seek a shorter initial period or include a termination-for-convenience clause so the city can exit if services fall short. City attorney Gavin said the city would seek to include a termination-for-convenience provision in the contract.
Mayor Creswell and other council members noted uncertainty about whether the county would retain its current planner and flagged recent turnover and hiring challenges. “They've raised their money way up,” one council member said of the county's recruitment efforts; councilors said those factors reinforced the need to secure dependable service for Harriman.
The council moved, seconded and voted unanimously to authorize negotiations and requested that staff return a draft contract for formal approval at the next meeting. The authorization does not finalize services, prices or a contract term; council deliberated only whether to open negotiations and to define basic protections such as termination language.
What happens next: City staff will draft a contract reflecting the council's direction, including the proposed prorated start and a termination-for-convenience clause, and return it to the council for approval.
