Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Personnel commissioners debate applying seniority credits to internal applicants
Summary
Commissioners reviewed decades of rule language and agreed staff will research inconsistencies after finding seniority credits explicitly referenced in some historical rules but not present in the current sections governing promotional/internal lists.
The Personnel Commission reviewed its rules on seniority credit and directed staff to research and clarify whether service‑based seniority points should apply to internal/promotional recruitments.
Mr. Ortiz walked commissioners through the rulebook language and said that the current references to seniority and veterans preference appear in the sections governing merged and open competitive lists but do not clearly apply to strictly internal promotional lists. Commissioners noted historical language (cited back to 1984 and a 2011 reference) that described seniority credits for promotional examinations but said the rulebook language since 2020 lacks that specific promotional/internal reference.
Commissioners raised the concrete concern that seniority credits — traditionally up to five points based on years of service — could alter who advances to interviews and that unclear rules have generated member questions about fairness. One commissioner asked whether the five‑point seniority step could push a long‑tenured employee over another candidate with the same examination score.
Staff said they would highlight the relevant sections for commissioners and make historical documents available for review. Commissioners discussed potentially amending the rules to add clear language so internal applicants, hiring managers and the public understand when any seniority credit applies.
No formal change to the rules was adopted at the meeting; staff will return with research and proposed language for future consideration.
