Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sports Betting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules committee refers sports-betting bill to Commerce after debate over proper jurisdiction
Summary
The Rules and Administration Committee voted to send Senate File 4139, a sports-betting bill, to the Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee after a divided debate over whether the bill should first go to State and Local Government; supporters cited consumer-protection provisions while opponents emphasized committee jurisdiction precedent.
The Minnesota Senate Rules and Administration Committee on March 19 voted to refer Senate File 4139, a proposal to legalize online sports betting, to the Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee after a contested procedural debate over which panel should have the first hearing.
Senator France, the bill's presenter, asked the Rules Committee to allow the bill to go to Commerce so "we get a full opportunity here" to consider the consumer protection portions of the proposal. He told the committee he had spoken with the chairs of the relevant committees and that the bill's chief author supported Commerce as the first stop.
Senator Rasmussen objected, urging that the State and Local Government Committee is the committee of "primary concern and jurisdiction" for gambling-related bills and noting that prior sports-gambling measures in recent biennia were first referred to State and Local Government. "We have committee jurisdictions for a reason," Rasmussen said, arguing the committee of primary jurisdiction should have the first hearing.
The committee proceeded to two formal motions. Senator Marty moved to re-refer SF 4139 to the State and Local Government Committee; the clerk called the roll and the chair announced that the motion did not prevail. Senator France then moved to refer the file to the Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee; the clerk took a roll call and the chair announced the motion was adopted and that the bill would be referred to Commerce and Consumer Protection.
The debate was procedural: members repeatedly emphasized that the committee was discussing referral and not the merits of the bill itself. Supporters of the Commerce referral pointed to the bill's opening sections on consumer protections, while opponents emphasized longstanding practice and the published jurisdiction lists.
Next steps: Senate File 4139 will be scheduled for a hearing in the Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee, which members said would not preclude subsequent consideration by State and Local Government or other committees with jurisdictional claims.
