Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mesa County Valley School District No. 51 board unanimously backs grant-support resolution; no district funds pledged
Summary
The Mesa County Valley School District No. 51 board approved a resolution supporting a $50,000 grant request for a project referred to in the transcript as “Chapida” (also transcribed as “Chapita”), while noting the district will not provide direct funding.
The Mesa County Valley School District No. 51 board voted unanimously to approve a resolution supporting a grant request for a project identified in the meeting transcript as “Chapida” (the transcript alternatively spells it “Chapita”). The board’s special meeting included a brief discussion of the resolution and a staff clarification that the district is not committing district funds to the project.
The resolution, introduced at the special meeting, expresses the board’s support for a $50,000 grant application to complete work at the site. Clint, identified in the meeting only by his first name and referred to by colleagues as the district staff member who provided the clarification, told the board, “and there is no financial commitment from the district here. This is just a $50,000 ask to complete some work that's being done at uh Chapida.” The board chair said the resolution language is available online and likened the support to previous grant-application assistance the district provided for Palisade.
Board members voted without recorded opposition. Mr. Chavez, Mrs. Evansson, Mrs. Heights, Mr. Jones and Miss Lima each voted in favor of the resolution, and the motion passed unanimously. The motion and second were made during the meeting but the transcript does not record the names of the mover or the seconder.
The resolution as discussed in the meeting commits only the board’s endorsement of the grant application; the district confirmed it did not pledge local funds or a budgetary commitment during this session. The board adjourned shortly after the vote.
What happens next: the resolution is intended to accompany a grant application; the meeting transcript notes the resolution text is posted online but does not specify the grant program, application deadline or the project's precise scope. The transcript also contains inconsistent spelling for the project name ("Chapida" vs. "Chapita"); the district should be consulted or its online posting checked to confirm the correct name and project details.
