Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ark 95 Overlay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sedgwick County staff propose protective overlay for ARK 95 corridor; commissioners express support
Summary
Planning director Scott Wadel asked commissioners to initiate review of a corridor preservation overlay for the long‑planned ARK 95 corridor to protect a 100‑foot corridor from incompatible large‑scale development; commissioners discussed timing, public outreach and a related $3 million planning grant.
Scott Wadel, Sedgwick County planning director, asked the Board of County Commissioners at a March 10 workshop to consider initiating a corridor preservation overlay (CPO) for the ARK 95 corridor in the county's south‑southeast area. Wadel said the overlay is an existing zoning tool that places an overlay district on top of base zoning to ensure improvements of a certain scale do not conflict with planned public infrastructure.
Wadel told commissioners the overlay would subject relevant development proposals to a conditional‑use–style review, with the Metropolitan Area Planning Commission (MAPC) providing an advisory recommendation to the Board. He said small, low‑value improvements that do not meet floor‑area or value thresholds could be approved administratively by the zoning administrator, but larger projects would go through the formal notice, MAPC review and protest period that accompany zoning changes.
The ARK 95 corridor has been identified in county plans dating back to 2008 and in a 2017 study that mapped potential corridor alignments and improvements, Wadel said. Applying a CPO now would let staff and MAPC evaluate where a protective overlay should be placed, hold at least one public open house to collect property‑owner feedback before formal notices are mailed, and notify owners in any chosen boundary so they understand potential constraints before investing in major improvements.
Commissioners asked whether applying a CPO would give the county an advantage in securing construction funding; a county representative said the overlay itself would not change selection priority for federal or state grants. Commissioners and staff linked the timeline for planning work to a planning grant being pursued through Senator Moran's office; one participant said the last correspondence from Davenport indicated the $3 million of planning funds had been approved and was moving forward for planning and development work. Wadel said those planning funds, once disbursed through KDOT, would support environmental studies and preliminary planning that could begin in the next couple of years.
Public works staff described ARK 95 as a long‑range, phased project that could take on the order of 20 years to fully build out; near‑term steps include securing access across K‑15 and river crossings. Wadel said the CPO would primarily serve to inform property owners that a reserved corridor exists and to flag proposals that might create conflicts with future infrastructure. He recommended the following sequence if commissioners initiate the overlay: staff review and scoping, MAPC advanced plans deliberations (possibly more than one meeting), an open house for affected property owners, MAPC recommendation and then the standard zoning public notice and county commission hearing.
No formal initiation motion or vote was recorded at the workshop. Commissioners generally expressed support for advancing the overlay discussion and for early public outreach to reduce anxiety before formal notices are issued.
