Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges stricter oversight of crossing guards; council approves item 7e

Temple City City Council · June 4, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Resident Jerry Jambazian told the council he frequently observes crossing guards using cell phones while on duty, cited a roughly $198,000 program budget and hourly pay over $30, and urged better training and accountability; the council voted unanimously to approve item 7e and staff said they would follow up.

Jerry Jambazian spoke during the meeting’s item 7e public comment on June 4 to raise safety concerns about school crossing guards, saying he frequently sees guards on their cell phones and urging the city to strengthen training and accountability.

"Many many times I see the crossing guards on their cell phone either on it or looking at it and they should have 100% attention to what they're doing," Jambazian said, calling it a safety issue given children’s presence at crossings. He noted the city's budgeted amount for crossing-guard services is about $198,000 per year and that guards are paid more than $30 per hour.

City Manager Brian Cook acknowledged the concern and said staff had taken note and would look into the issue. After public comment, a councilmember moved and seconded approval of item 7e; the council took a roll-call vote and approved the item unanimously (Council Member Chen, Council Member Sternquist, Mayor Pro Tem U and Mayor Chavez voting yes).

The transcript does not specify the exact contractual or programmatic change contained in item 7e beyond the vote; council direction on follow-up was limited to staff reviewing the concern and reporting back. The council’s unanimous vote carried the item as presented.

Next steps: staff will follow up on the crossing-guard concern raised in public comment; the council gave no timetable in the meeting to return with findings or corrective actions.