Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Steven Palmer Site topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs in informally on Steven Palmer site; member announces they will not seek reappointment
Summary
Commission members said the Steven Palmer building is not on the historic registry and the commission has no statutory jurisdiction; members expressed mixed views on preservation versus redevelopment for affordable housing. A commission member announced they will not renew their appointment; the group was asked to consider a replacement as representative to the Community Preservation Commission (CPC).
At the April 13 meeting the commission briefly discussed historic considerations for the Steven Palmer building and heard a member announce they will not seek reappointment when their term ends in June.
Jeff raised the Steven Palmer building for the commission iscussion and Gloria noted the property is not on the town dministrative historic registry, so the commission has no statutory authority over the site. Members expressed differing perspectives: one member said the building should be demolished and redeveloped with affordable and senior housing, while others recalled community advocates who sought to preserve the structure. Gloria said the commission can offer historical information and opinion but lacks regulatory standing for the property.
Separately, a commission member announced they would not renew their appointment (term expires in June) and reminded the group that the commission is statutorily required to have a representative on the Community Preservation Commission (CPC). Members were asked to discuss and identify who might fill that role before June.
No formal position, vote or advisory letter on the Steven Palmer building was taken at the meeting.
