Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Bond topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jefferson County library officials lay out $10 million bond plan to renovate Madison campus
Summary
Library director Judy Turpin and advisers told the County Council on March 10 that a proposed $10 million property‑tax supported bond would fund renovations to the Madison library campus, including HVAC, accessibility and space reconfiguration; the plan would trigger a new levy and proceed only after public hearings and county approval.
The Jefferson County Public Library System presented a proposal to the County Council on March 10 to issue a $10 million property‑tax supported general obligation bond to fund renovations at the Madison library campus.
Judy Turpin, director of the Jefferson County Public Library System, outlined facility needs and community use, noting the library served a high volume of users and provides services beyond book lending. "We had over 75,000 visitors last year," Turpin said, and the library recorded about "190,000 items borrowed," including physical and digital materials. She described structural and accessibility problems — failing concrete and box gutters, deteriorating doors and windows, narrow aisles that impede wheelchair access, and an aging HVAC system installed in 2003 — and said high utility bills contributed to an urgency to upgrade the building.
Municipal adviser Jason Dansel of Baker Tilly presented the financing model. Dansel said a $10 million borrowing would yield roughly $9,730,000 for construction after bond issuance costs. He described a 15‑year repayment plan that the presenters selected to limit taxpayer costs, and showed a conservative interest estimate (6 percent) that produced an illustrative interest total in the presentation. Dansel summarized tax‑rate impacts using an example table: the modeled debt‑service tax rate was presented at about 6.12 cents and an example homeowner figure was shown in the packet as an additional annual tax liability for a modeled household.
Bond counsel Sarah Carell of Ice Miller described the approval and statutory process: the project is subject to public notices, two public hearings convened by the library board and a 30‑day petition/remonstrance period. Because library boards in Indiana are appointed rather than elected, Carell said county approval is required for issuance of library debt; the presenters indicated they would return to the council in July to request the council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution if the library board proceeds. "We're just getting started," Carell said, describing the procedural steps and the possibility that a petition could delay or stop the measure.
Council members asked about remaining grants and fundraising, operating‑cost savings from a new HVAC, construction phasing and timeline, and the distributional effect of property‑tax caps. Turpin said the library continues to pursue grants and fundraising; Dansel and Carell answered procedural and statutory questions and noted that if many homeowners are already at statutory caps the tax increase could shift more of the burden to taxpayers in other parts of the county.
Turpin also highlighted noncapital services the library provides — free notary service, hotspots, programming and outreach — and noted a recently funded bookmobile with a planned ribbon cutting on April 10. She said KRM Architecture has been engaged to preserve the building's historic exterior while reconfiguring interior space to improve accessibility and programming.
Next steps: presenters said the library board will hold required public hearings and, absent a petition, will seek the council's formal approval later in the year; the bond sale was described as possible before the end of 2026 if all approvals proceed.
