Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palmdale reports 185 building permits in 2025 but faces challenges meeting 6,640-unit allocation; council asks for corrected housing data
Summary
City planners told the council Palmdale’s 2021–29 allocation is 6,640 units and that 185 building permits were issued in 2025; council members pressed staff for clearer numbers, a status report on nearly 497 pending units, and noted development constraints such as Joshua tree protections and financing hurdles.
City planners presented Palmdale’s annual housing element progress report on March 3, telling the council the city’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the 2021–2029 cycle is 6,640 units and that the city issued 185 building permits in 2025.
Brenda Magna summarized the required state reporting and told the council, “A total of 6,640 units have been allocated to the city of Palmdale for the 2021 through 2029 planning period.” Council members pressed staff for clarity about spreadsheet totals that did not add up in the packet and requested corrected, legible tables before the April 1 submittal to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
Members raised several recurring barriers to construction. Council Member Loa and others flagged permitting responsiveness and developer complaints about delayed staff communication. Several council members emphasized that environmental constraints — notably strict protections for Joshua trees and endangered-species mitigation — add substantial cost and timing burdens for local projects and may limit the practical pace of construction.
Council asked staff to return with a short status report on the roughly 497-unit difference between proposed and approved units in the staff spreadsheet, and to ensure the numbers that are sent to Sacramento are corrected and legible. Staff said the HCD form uses an embedded macro-driven spreadsheet and that they would audit the inputs and provide corrected figures for the record.
Planners also noted that while the city can ensure adequate land capacity and zoning to accommodate RHNA numbers, the city cannot guarantee that private developers will construct units; recent slowdowns are tied to financing and market conditions. Council members asked for further outreach to developers to identify specific process impediments and for a follow-up at the next meeting before the submission deadline.
The council approved the staff report and directed staff to return with corrected tables and a status update on the pending applications.
