Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parks department urges $8.9M annual TAT allocation to tackle urgent roof backlog

Honolulu City Council Budget & Fiscal Committee · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Honolulu's Department of Parks and Recreation told the City Council its asset-management review found 129 park building roofs needing replacement within five years and asked for a proposed $8.9 million annual allocation from the Transient Accommodations Tax to scale maintenance support services and prevent condemnations.

Director Thielen told the Council on March 10 that a newly completed asset-management roofing assessment found roughly 400 DPR-owned roofs had been inspected and "129 need to be replaced within the next five years." She said delays in replacing roofs can quickly escalate into structural problems and far higher costs, citing a Palolo gymnasium project where deferred repairs turned into a two-step structural and roofing reconstruction that lengthened timelines and costs.

Thielen asked the Budget & Fiscal Committee to approve funding that would add capacity in the department's Maintenance Support Services (MSS) work program. "We're proposing an $8.9 million allocation from the Transient Accommodations Tax for MSS's work program in FY27," she said, framing the request as an annual allocation to scale roof replacements, small capital repairs and preventive maintenance so buildings remain open to the public.

Why it matters: DPR staff showed Council a 10-year trend demonstrating that prior spikes in work resulted from one-time federal relief and ARPA funding; those one-offs temporarily increased repairs performed through MSS but did not provide a durable funding stream. Thielen told members that without a steady $8.9 million appropriation the program would slump back below $3 million a year, substantially slowing roof work and increasing the number of condemned or temporarily closed recreation buildings.

Council reaction split on funding source and purpose. Floor Leader Kia'aina pressed whether roofs and similar maintenance fit the statutory purpose of TAT (projects that mitigate visitor impacts on natural resources), asking "I don't know if roofs qualify" and whether the department intended the allocation as a baseline funding source. DPR staff replied the request was intended as an annual allocation, not a permanent base reallocation of TAT, and said the department would provide the Council with the list of prioritized projects that informed the $8.9 million figure.

DPR also described cost-saving approaches and partnerships: the department identified nonrevenue DOT-construction contributions (DOT performing park-adjacent construction as part of road work) and energy-performance contracts (Noresco and similar agreements) that deliver upgrades while offsetting staff time. Thielen said the department is implementing master agreements and an asset-management software system to convert the spreadsheet inventory into a schedule-driven database to prioritize the most-used buildings, reduce design and procurement delays, and speed contracting for roofing and small capital repairs.

Next steps: DPR committed to share the roofing project list by council district and to rework the draft priorities to ensure the highest-use facilities are addressed first. The Council asked for the projects list and additional justification for TAT eligibility before deciding whether to adopt the proposed allocation into the FY27 package.