Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents press for stronger retroactive enforcement as Planning presents residential lighting standards

Select Board, Town of Brookline · October 15, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning presented a warrant article to add outdoor lighting standards for residential districts (fully shielded luminaires, ≤3000K, ≤5 ft trespass, hours limits). Town Council and the Advisory Subcommittee urged exploring a general 'dark‑sky' bylaw to address existing non‑conforming lights and retroactivity; residents urged stronger enforceable remedies for current nuisance lighting.

The Select Board conducted a public hearing on Warrant Article 12 on Oct. 15, a Planning Department proposal to add outdoor lighting standards to Brookline’s zoning bylaw for residential districts.

Nicole Pere (Zoning Coordinator) said the article targets glare and light trespass by requiring fully shielded luminaires, limiting color temperature to 3,000K, capping light trespass to 5 feet on adjacent property and restricting certain decorative and café lighting hours (6 a.m. to midnight). The draft draws on Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) standards and local stakeholder input; the Planning Board recommended favorable action with a minor clarification on dark‑sky luminaires.

Public commenters and the Planning Department’s advisory public‑safety subcommittee urged a more holistic approach. Town Council advised that regulating illumination as a general bylaw (a nuisance regulation) can allow retroactive application to existing non‑conforming lights, whereas adding illumination rules to zoning will create non‑conforming situations that the town must recognize and which are harder to change later. Several residents described sleepless nights from unshielded neighbor lights and asked the town to pursue a dark‑sky general bylaw that could address existing problems and enforcement.

Planning staff said they are open to pursuing complementary general‑bylaw work later and noted enforcement would rely on the Building Commissioner and existing sign‑bylaw language to address complaints in the short term.

Next steps: Planning will consider advisory‑committee feedback and may return with refined language or a proposal for a complementary dark‑sky bylaw to address retrofit/enforcement questions.