Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Proposal would let homeschooled students try out for local public school teams under same academic and health standards

Maryland House Ways and Means Committee · March 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Delegate Stephanie Smith introduced HB 1043 to authorize, not require, public high schools to allow homeschooled students to participate in school‑sponsored athletics and activities if they meet the same academic, health and conduct standards. A broad panel of homeschool families, students and advocacy groups testified in favor; lawmakers discussed academic portfolio reviews and consistent LEA procedures.

Delegate Stephanie Smith presented House Bill 1043, which would authorize public high schools to allow homeschooled students to participate in school‑sponsored athletic activities and extracurriculars provided the students meet the same academic requirements, health standards and codes of conduct as enrolled peers. The sponsor emphasized the bill is permissive for districts and is not intended to displace enrolled students.

A wide group of homeschooled students, parents, and advocacy organizations supported the measure. Several parents and students described practical barriers: high travel costs for private teams, limited local club options and missed recruiting exposure for college athletics. Students and alumni said sports teach teamwork, discipline and access to adult mentors and medical attention.

Legislators questioned operational issues. Committee members asked how portfolio reviews and academic eligibility would be enforced consistently across local education agencies (LEAs). The sponsor and several homeschool witnesses said Maryland’s existing home‑instruction portfolio review process (conducted by the LEA) provides the academic check, and they proposed a 30‑day correction window if a portfolio shows deficiencies.

Supporters urged statewide clarity to prevent inconsistent county interpretations; some witnesses recommended amending permissive language (“may allow”) to stronger statewide direction so homeschool families receive equal access across counties. Opponents were not present in the hearing panel, but committee members pressed for details on avoiding unintended displacement and ensuring uniform academic standards in practice.

What happens next: Committee members requested clearer drafting on academic verification and local implementation; sponsors indicated willingness to work on technical amendments.