Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Local hauler asks Springfield council to revisit decade‑old refuse rate cap

Springfield City Council · March 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Jim Graham of Lake Area Disposal urged the council to review an ordinance that caps garbage rates and to allow a rate increase tied to rising fuel, landfill and processing costs; he said statutory language requires a three‑year review that has not occurred since 2019 and that recycling revenues are minimal.

Jim Graham, owner of Lake Area Disposal, told the council during public comment that a rate cap and review schedule in the city’s ordinance have not been followed and that the industry’s costs have risen sharply since the rules were written.

Graham said his company, a family business founded in 1932 with roughly 90 employees, serves much of Sangamon County and that the city remains its largest source of business. He asked the council to review and update the rate language to allow a modest rate increase to cover higher disposal, fuel and processing costs. “In the last 10 years, everything has went up in the garbage business,” Graham said, and he cited a statutory provision in the ordinance that requires the council to review rates at least every three years beginning July 1, 2019.

Graham also called attention to recycling revenue, saying the proceeds from glass are negligible (he cited about $6 per ton) and arguing that the ordinance’s promise to offset material processing costs has not materialized for haulers. He left council members his handout and said he is available to discuss technical details and supporting documents.

Council did not take immediate action on Graham’s request during the meeting; staff follow‑up was suggested so the council can review the ordinance language and the haulers’ cost data at a future committee meeting.