Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the It Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County IT staff recommend switching from VMware to Microsoft Hyper‑V to avoid steep licensing increases
Summary
IT staff told commissioners that VMware licensing increases after Broadcom’s acquisition could push annual costs toward $100,000; they recommended migrating to Microsoft Hyper‑V and a scaled hardware plan estimated at about $341,000 to avoid paying another year of the higher VMware fees.
Grant Kinsey, an IT staff member, told the Kootenai County Board of Commissioners on March 3 that licensing for the county’s hypervisor product has jumped dramatically since Broadcom bought VMware and that continuing with VMware could become a recurring six-figure annual expense. "You're basically going to need to go to $100,000 a year every year," Kinsey said, describing a five‑year price path that begins near $60,000 and climbs beyond $100,000.
Kinsey said the county historically paid about $14,000 a year for the hypervisor but that the vendor has raised prices sharply. He recommended migrating to Microsoft Hyper‑V — which the county already holds through its Windows/server licensing — and pursuing a targeted set of hardware and storage purchases rather than a full replacement now. "We can get Hyper‑V effectively free," Kinsey said, noting improvements in the product over the last year.
Why it matters: licensing and hardware choices will affect recurring IT budgets and disaster‑recovery capability. Kinsey said the full, all‑new capital plan could approach $1 million, but a pared‑down approach focused on storage and selective hardware upgrades reduces the suggested cost to about $341,000. He told the board there is roughly $1.5 million in the IT fund balance available for such projects.
Board members pressed on specifics: commissioners asked about the half‑million server estimate (Kinsey said commodity RAM shortages tied to AI demand have inflated server prices), the storage line of about $269,000 (two arrays to support cross‑site replication), and redundancy and failover scenarios. Kinsey said the county would want about 200 terabytes of usable storage on each side for full replication but that a 150‑terabyte sizing could be acceptable and would reduce cost.
Next steps and staff direction: Kinsey said the project paperwork is scheduled for the afternoon business meeting and that staff could delay procurement if the board prefers. He advised the board could pull the purchase from IT fund balance now to avoid paying another year of elevated VMware fees; commissioners asked for more time and paperwork and did not make a final decision at the status meeting.
Quotes: "We let you know we're going to look into what are our options here," Kinsey said, describing vendor behavior and market conditions. "This is getting a little crazy here," he added about vendor pricing.
Context and caveats: Kinsey warned that the current AI‑driven RAM shortage has inflated hardware pricing and that market conditions may stabilize in about two years; delaying some purchases could produce savings but risks running older hardware longer. He also noted the county’s VMware contract is terminable and that staff are exploring options to avoid long‑term vendor lock‑in.
The commissioners did not vote; they asked staff for more detailed proposals and paperwork to consider at a business meeting.
