Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lakewood City Council limits LakewoodSpeaks comments to one per person per agenda item

Lakewood City Council · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its March 2, 2026 study session, Lakewood City Council voted 8–3 to limit submissions on LakewoodSpeaks to one comment per person per agenda item, citing concerns about back-and-forth exchanges online and administrative burden; three councilors opposed the change.

Lakewood City Council voted 8–3 on March 2, 2026, to limit the city's online public-comment platform, LakewoodSpeaks, to a single submission per person per agenda item.

The change, proposed during a review of the council's policies and procedures, was framed by the mayor as a way to reduce repetitive back-and-forth on the platform while preserving the option to speak in person. "We would be changing it so that one person can speak on or submit a comment on LakewoodSpeaks per topic and if they wanted to show up in person and speak in chambers as well, but LakewoodSpeaks would be one comment per person per agenda item," the mayor said before calling the vote.

Why it matters: Council members and staff said the intent is to make online comments an extension of in-person public comment and to prevent the platform from devolving into a real-time debate thread that complicates meetings and staff administration. City staff told councilors they can implement duplicate-comment screening either through manual staff work or by programming the platform to block repeated submissions.

Council debate and vote: Several councilors raised administrative concerns about monitoring submissions during meetings and asked whether the city clerk's office or technology settings should enforce the rule. "It would be more administratively difficult ... for the city clerk's office as well as myself to stay on top of who has already spoken on LakewoodSpeaks and who is standing before us right at the moment," one councilor said; the mayor and other members responded that platform settings could be developed to help screen duplicates.

The final vote was 8 in favor and 3 opposed. Councilors Nystrom, I Cruz and Lebure voted no, according to the roll-call result announced after the vote.

Next steps: Council approved the policy change inside the policies-and-procedures manual; implementation will be handled by the city clerk's office and platform administrators, and staff said they may program settings to block duplicate submissions if the council wishes.

The study session continued with other policy discussions; the council adjourned at 9:07 p.m.