Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Okaloosa commissioners approve conditional purchase of 1.7‑acre Shalomar waterfront lot; interlocal talks continue over Holiday Isle management
Summary
The Okaloosa County Commission voted to pursue acquisition of a 1.7‑acre waterfront parcel in Shalomar and authorized staff to negotiate a purchase with contingencies including an appraisal, legislative funding, and a town contribution. Commissioners also spent hours trading options with Destin over management and uses at nearby state land (Holiday Isle/Noriega Point).
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously March 3 to move forward with a contingent purchase of a 1.7‑acre waterfront parcel in the town of Shalomar and to continue negotiations with local partners over management of a nearby state parcel at Holiday Isle.
County staff presented a purchase‑and‑sale framework calling for a roughly $3.0 million acquisition price, to be funded through a mix of sources if secured: a legislative appropriation (requested in the governor’s budget process), a contribution from the town of Shalomar, and county funds. County real estate staff told commissioners the offer includes standard contingencies—most notably a formal appraisal, a 90‑day due‑diligence window to inspect site conditions (including seawall suitability and utilities), and the requirement that the state/town funding materialize before closing. The board approved the purchase under those contingencies and asked staff to return with appraisal and inspection results before any final closing.
Why it matters: County staff and many public speakers framed the buy as a rare chance to secure public waterfront for a passive park, preserve scenic shoreline, and protect public access. Mayor Mark Franks of Shalomar said the acquisition would be “a once‑in‑a‑generation opportunity” to preserve open space and ensure public access. County staff highlighted that some development rights were in prior developer plans and that waterfront parcels are scarce, which informed the decision to pursue the property despite a higher asking price.
Key limits and safeguards: Commissioners repeatedly pressed staff to document unknowns before finalizing the deal. The board required—before any county funds are spent—that: - the county receive a written appraisal that supports proceeding; - state legislative funding (the county has requested roughly $1.5 million) be confirmed or replaced by alternate committed funding; - the town of Shalomar commit a portion of the purchase/development costs (staff requested approximately $1.5 million from the town), and - county inspections show the seawall and other shoreline structures are suitable or have a clearly costed remediation plan.
Commission discussion and local partnership: The item prompted broad discussion linking the Shalomar parcel to the larger Holiday Isle/Noriega Point negotiations with the City of Destin. Destin officials and city council members pressed for an interlocal in which they would be an equal partner and wanted stronger limits on commercial activity; county commissioners sought guarantees for county resident parking and asked for preservation of a public recreational marina in line with state cabinet direction. Commissioners agreed to appoint a small negotiating team (legal staff and one elected member from each government) to work on an interlocal and to return key draft terms to the full boards for public review. County Attorney staff confirmed that the management plan ultimately is likely to require approval by both bodies and that time limits and termination clauses can be written into an interlocal to avoid indefinite delays.
Next steps: Staff will obtain the appraisal and complete seawall and site suitability studies; county negotiators and legal counsel will meet with the town and the city’s designated representatives and their counsel; and staff will report back to the commission with appraisal results, any legislative funding award, and a recommended timeline toward a possible closing (the proposed purchase sale agreement included an October closing window and other standard contingencies). The commission emphasized that final approval and disbursement of county funds depend on those follow‑up deliverables.
What the county did not do: The board did not commit general‑fund dollars for long‑term park operations or change any covenants that govern adjacent private property; nor did the board alter existing development orders for the neighboring condo marina. Commissioners repeatedly urged that public input and city/town approvals remain part of any final management plan.
Context and public reaction: Dozens of public commenters, including Shalomar and Destin officials and area residents, urged preservation, careful planning for parking and traffic, and a transparent interlocal. Speakers on both sides urged compromise: Destin officials sought assurances that their vision of conservation would be preserved while protecting city interests and infrastructure. Several commissioners said they prefer a pragmatic, stepwise approach—agree broad policy here and let lawyers and technical teams draft enforceable language.
The board’s action keeps the acquisition option alive while building in the protections commissioners asked for: appraisal, funding contingencies and site suitability checks. Commissioners said the next reports will determine whether the county proceeds to closing.

