Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Improvement Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Glendale reviews $2.8 billion proposed 10‑year capital improvement plan; FY27 first‑year appropriation set at $430 million

Glendale City Council · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff presented a proposed FY2027–2036 capital improvement plan totaling about $2.8 billion, with water, streets and public safety comprising roughly two‑thirds of the plan; the council asked for a concise fund‑number cheat sheet and follow‑up on several street and equipment projects.

City staff on March 3 presented Glendale’s proposed 10‑year capital improvement plan (FY2027–2036), which the packet estimates at about $2.8 billion, and outlined the FY27 appropriation of roughly $430 million, of which $217 million is projected carryover and $213 million is new funding.

Budget administrator Jonathan Hill told the council the proposed plan concentrates spending in three areas: water (about 30% of the 10‑year total), streets (about 24%) and public safety (about 13%), which together account for roughly 67% of the CIP. "What you see before you is the agenda," Hill said while walking through the funding charts and project lists; he also warned that some FY21–25 actuals in the packet were incorrect due to transition to a new Questica budgeting system and handed out a corrected spreadsheet.

Miss Lindsay summarized common funding sources for CIP projects: pay‑as‑you‑go (cash), bond proceeds (general obligation bonds that require voter authorization for libraries, parks and government facilities), state/regional/federal grants including ARPA, and enterprise or special‑revenue funds. She explained carryover occurs when a project spans fiscal years and that staff adjusts carryover amounts after the fiscal year closes and invoices are reconciled.

Staff presented program totals and examples: a 10‑year water CIP of about $852 million (rehab of water lines, booster stations, reservoirs; largely funded from water enterprise fund 6020), a 10‑year wastewater CIP near $289 million (sewer rehab, lift stations, treatment plant work funded mainly from sewer enterprise fund 6030), and a 10‑year streets program of approximately $673 million with projects including 59th Avenue (Camelback to Loop 101), a pavement management program and several reconstruction segments.

Council members asked for clearer fund‑number documentation. "Could you give that to us in a cheat sheet form?" one council member asked; staff agreed to provide a concise translator to help match fund numbers to fund types at the next budget meeting. On 59th Avenue specifically, staff member George reported design is about 90% complete and that three right‑of‑way acquisitions remain before final design and construction, with some work likely carrying into FY28.

The presentation also covered solid waste (ten‑year CIP ~ $68 million), where council members raised operational questions about street sweepers and replacement schedules; staff noted two basic sweeper types, ongoing grant applications and small local matches when grants are awarded.

Staff closed by reminding council of the budget calendar: an operating review on March 30, the full budget on April 14, a tentative adoption in May and final adoption with property‑tax levies in June.

The workshop is informational; no formal votes were taken and staff will return with revised materials and the operating budget for additional review.