Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves roof base bid and alternates, discusses long energy payback estimates
Summary
Trustees approved awarding the base roof bid and selected alternates to the low bidder, discussed varying energy-payback estimates (one up to ~42 years), and reviewed capital-outlay plans that include a $200,000 bus allocation and a proposed elevator expense.
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The board reviewed capital project estimates and awarded a roofing contract, while discussing energy-efficiency payback periods and other planned capital expenses.
An architect’s estimate previously put the project near $340,000; trustees noted the low bidder’s proposed turnaround was about 60 days after graduation. Board members debated the projected energy-payback period for added insulation and solar-like measures, with one trustee noting a 42-year payback and another showing a substantially shorter payback under more optimistic assumptions. Trustees requested the architect or bidder to present to the buildings-and-grounds committee to explain the alternates and why the architect recommended particular items.
A motion was made and seconded to approve the base roof bid and selected alternates from the low bidder (referred to in discussion as Hub City); the motion carried by voice vote. Staff said the district had included a $200,000 bus allocation in the capital-outlay worksheet and estimated roof work billing split between this fiscal year and next. Trustees also discussed a tentative $100,000 elevator estimate and other capital needs.
The board directed staff and the buildings-and-grounds committee to gather additional detail from the architect on energy calculations, material specifications and the alternates before finalizing the full contract schedule and payment timing.

