Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Industrial Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission narrows industrial‑zone changes: adds vehicle impound yards but keeps acreage limits; motion passes 4–2
Summary
The commission recommended County Commission adoption of ordinance changes to explicitly permit vehicle impound yards in I1 zones while retaining minimum‑lot requirements for intensive uses; commissioners debated whether impound yards should require a full acre and ultimately approved the staff approach with a smaller minimum for impounds (motion recorded and passed 4–2).
Get email alerts on the Industrial Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah County Planning Commission recommended that the County Commission adopt amendments to the county land‑use ordinance to explicitly allow vehicle impound yards in industrial (I1) zones, but it also voted to keep minimum‑area requirements for more intensive uses.
County planning staff told the commission that the proposed amendment has two elements: (1) consider removing the existing one‑acre minimum that applies to several intensive industrial uses in I1 areas, and (2) add vehicle impound yards as a discrete permitted use. Staff recommended adding vehicle impound yards to the permitted‑use list but keeping a one‑acre minimum for intensive uses such as automobile wrecking and salvage yards. Bryce Armstrong and Greg Robinson explained the county’s policy concerns: smaller lots that host intensive uses can complicate future annexation by adjacent cities and lack the infrastructure and public‑safety services (sewer, firefighting, police response) cities provide.
Applicant Jamie Evans, a property owner with holdings in several county industrial islands, urged removing the one‑acre minimum county‑wide. Evans said fragmented ownership in areas such as Lehi State Street and Gold Key makes it difficult for owners to assemble one‑acre parcels and that existing county uses (for example a warming center) function on smaller parcels. “The one‑acre site becomes problematic…we think the one‑acre is a burden,” Evans said.
Jackie Larson, a Spanish Fork property owner, told the commission she opposed converting parcels in that area into long‑term industrial uses and urged caution given Spanish Fork’s planning for a gateway and rail station.
Commissioners discussed tradeoffs at length. Several commissioners noted that impound yards are operationally different from wrecking or salvage yards—impounds are often temporary storage for towed vehicles—so a smaller minimum acreage could be workable if the site has no occupied structures or if health code and septic requirements are met. Commissioners cited local examples of impound yards operating on parcels smaller than an acre and raised public‑safety and emergency response concerns for scattered industrial islands.
After debate a commissioner moved (and a second was offered) to recommend the staff‑proposed ordinance language with a modification recorded in the motion setting a smaller minimum for vehicle impound yards (the motion text records a numeric figure described in discussion as a three‑quarters‑acre threshold). The commission approved the recommendation by roll call, 4–2, and the planning commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the County Commission for final action.
What’s next: The County Commission will receive the planning commission’s recommendation and schedule a final hearing. The planning commission flagged that health‑department requirements (septic, replacement fields) and fire code standards would still apply to any facility that includes occupied structures.

