Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Prioritization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CPAC proposes software scoring tool to rank Stafford Schools’ $123 million 3R backlog
Summary
The Capital Improvement Planning Advisory Committee proposed a risk‑scoring, software‑based system to rank more than 300 deferred maintenance projects, arguing the district has an estimated $123 million maintenance deficit and needs an objective way to prioritize limited 3R dollars.
The Capital Improvement Planning Advisory Committee (CPAC) presented an annual report and a proof‑of‑concept for a software‑based project‑prioritization tool intended to help the district evaluate more than 300 unfunded 3R (repair, renovation, replacement) projects.
CPAC chair Molly Denim described a roughly $123 million facilities maintenance deficit and noted industry minimums of about $21 million per year for a school system the size of Stafford’s. The committee demonstrated a risk‑matrix approach that scores projects across six categories—health and safety, infrastructure, operational use, financial restraints, asset life expectancy and recency—and ranks projects with a transparent equation so staff and the public can see comparative urgency.
Denim said the tool is “a starting point” intended to reduce anecdotal or ad‑hoc prioritization and to enable the board to parcel funds into project buckets so less‑urgent needs (playground equipment, certain additions) can receive some regular funding alongside critical items such as roofs or fire suppression. The committee also recommended developing written standards and a centralized project management tool for better historical tracking and to reduce reliance on institutional memory.
Board members and staff discussed next steps: CPAC asked for guidance whether the committee should refine the proof‑of‑concept with staff inputs, or whether staff should take the idea forward into procurement and implementation. Several board members praised the approach as a way to make 3R decisions more objective and easier to explain to the public.
Ending: CPAC requested feedback from the board and offered to continue refining the tool with staff. The board requested additional staff input and legal/financial review before committing to procurement or a specific software product.
