Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Foreign Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Radio guests call current U.S. war unjustified and urge constitutional and protest responses
Summary
On the April 14, 2026 episode of Gung Ho, hosts and guest Len Green condemned the U.S. decision to go to war, argued it was based on misleading claims about Iran's nuclear program, and discussed impeachment, the 25th Amendment, and mass protests as responses.
On the April 14, 2026 episode of the radio program Gung Ho, host and guest Len Green criticized the U.S. decision to pursue military action related to Iran and urged both electoral and public protest responses.
Green and the host recounted earlier antiwar organizing around the Iraq War, saying critics were initially vilified but ultimately proven right about faulty prewar intelligence. Green asserted the current administration "started the war without consulting the American people, without consulting Congress," and described the action as based on misleading claims that Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon.
The speakers debated constitutional options for removing a president they described as acting like a tyrant. They outlined impeachment and the 25th Amendment as available routes, noting both would require cooperation from Congress or the cabinet. The host said he preferred waiting for elections and called for voting and electing representatives who would pursue impeachment; Green emphasized large-scale demonstrations and "direct action," arguing mass public turnout had influenced past political outcomes.
Both speakers criticized what they described as erosion of U.S. institutions, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice, and raised concerns about the potential for extralegal actions before the next election. The host referenced January 6 and ongoing prosecutions, saying that events around that date showed a willingness by some to try to overturn electoral outcomes.
On the war itself, the discussion challenged the stated justifications, arguing that previous treaty arrangements and international inspections had constrained Iran's nuclear program and that ending those agreements removed oversight. One speaker said the current conflict was a "patchwork quilt of justifications" and condemned civilian casualties and reported bombings of shipping and fishing boats.
The program closed with a call to defend constitutional processes by voting, organizing, and demonstrating; no formal policy proposals or governmental actions were adopted during the broadcast.
