Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Promotion Retention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates retention and acceleration policy; calls for research and clearer language
Summary
Trustees reviewed a first reading of a reorganized promotion/acceleration/retention policy, discussed discouraging retention beyond kindergarten, and asked staff for research and a possible study session on acceleration and enrichment options.
On June 11 the Redwood City School District board held a first reading of BP 5123, a reorganized policy covering promotion, acceleration and retention, and discussed clarifying the district’s stance and next steps for policy language.
Anna Herrera and Superintendent Dr. Baker explained the administrative regulations and said the district emphasizes intervention (MTSS) and evidence before any retention decisions. "Since I've been superintendent we have not done one" retention beyond kindergarten, Dr. Baker said, indicating that retention in older grades is rare and that the district prefers targeted interventions.
Trustees pressed for stronger policy language to discourage retention beyond kindergarten except in exceptional circumstances and asked staff to bring short, research‑based materials and a potential study session so the board can weigh acceleration (including course or grade skipping) versus enrichment models. Several trustees supported explicitly encouraging enrichment and routinely tracking whether acceleration options are reaching students equitably.
Staff agreed to examine research and return with options and clarifying language. Trustees also noted operational considerations (assessment measures, ELD supports for multilingual learners, and the social/developmental effects of grade or course skipping) and requested the board policy committee propose firmer phrasing in the retention section for future readings.
