Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy 5756 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Edison board to rescind policy 5756, citing concerns about gender-identity rules and student safety
Summary
Multiple public commenters at the June 11 caucus urged the Edison Township Board of Education to rescind district policy 5756, arguing it keeps parents uninformed and raises safety and medical concerns; the board did not vote on the policy at this meeting.
Get email alerts on the Policy 5756 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dozens of residents used the public-comment period at the June 11 Edison Township Board of Education caucus to press the board to rescind Policy 5756, which commenters described as permitting access to restrooms, locker rooms and athletics consistent with a student’s gender identity.
Public commenters — including Anthony Mara, Ron Mack and several other community members — called for the board to remove the policy or bring it to a vote. Speakers argued parents should be notified when students raise gender-identity issues with staff, said the policy places girls at a competitive disadvantage in athletics and expressed medical and mental-health concerns tied to gender-affirming care. One commenter asked the board to "have some courage" and prioritize children and families.
Several speakers referenced medical opinions and recent testimony they say supports restricting gender-affirming medical interventions for minors. Ron Mack told the board he had shared a video titled “doctors protecting children” and urged trustees to bring Policy 5756 to a vote. Another speaker read testimony by a witness who described negative outcomes after medical transition.
Not all commenters addressed the policy in the same terms: some framed the matter as one of parental rights and safety in school facilities; others raised broader cultural concerns about curriculum and district priorities. Applause followed a number of the public comments recorded in the transcript.
The board adjourned to a closed session later in the meeting for personnel, student and legal matters and then reconvened to vote on resolutions about a principal appointment and insurance contracts. The June 11 record does not show any board action to rescind, amend or vote on Policy 5756; public commenters asking for a vote were not recorded as having secured one at this caucus session.
What happens next: The transcript indicates public comment opponents want the board to consider a formal vote; the board did not publicly schedule or announce action on Policy 5756 during the June 11 caucus.

