Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grants And Nonprofits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winter Haven narrows grant eligibility, sets funding guidance and preserves legacy bucket
Summary
Commissioners gave the grant-and-aid review committee direction to exclude schools and foundations from this year's discretionary grant pool, set aside $145,000 for six legacy agencies, and provided a working total of $382,537 for committee consideration (leaving $237,537 after the legacy set-aside).
The Winter Haven City Commission on April 13 gave staff and the grant-and-aid review committee guidance on how to evaluate 58 applications for fiscal-year funding: exclude school-related foundations from eligibility, dedicate $145,000 for six longstanding "legacy" agencies, and use a working total of $382,537 (a 10% increase over last year) to guide awards.
Katrina Hill, who presented the applications update, said all 58 proposals were complete at the filing deadline and that total requests equaled $601,833. She told commissioners that returning applicants (including legacy agencies) accounted for about $497,700 of the request while brand-new applicants asked for about $104,133.
Commissioners discussed whether the six legacy agencies (identified in staff materials as Boys & Girls Club; Girls, Inc.; Meals on Wheels; Public Education Partnership; the Haley Center; and the Neighborhood Service Center) should retain a guaranteed bucket. Several commissioners supported preserving the legacy allocation to ensure those longstanding providers continue receiving dependable support. Commissioner Mercer said legacy organizations are "tried and true" partners that provide essential services and advocated keeping a dedicated allocation.
The commission's guidance: maintain a $145,000 legacy bucket and give the committee a working total of $382,537 (which, after setting aside $145,000, leaves roughly $237,537 to allocate among returning and new applicants). Staff said the committee will receive application binders next Friday, perform site visits or follow-up as needed, convene in May and bring recommended awards back to the commission for action (likely at a late-May or early-June meeting).
Commissioners also asked staff and the committee to weigh fiscal responsibility and measurable outcomes when recommending awards, to enforce conflict-of-interest and sunshine rules for committee members, and to bring additional budget or program details to commissioners who request them.
Next steps: the review committee will meet, prepare a recommendation, and return a proposed awards list to the commission for final approval. The commission noted it may adjust amounts when the committee report arrives.
