Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board amends student representative rule to allow nominees who are sophomores or juniors; removes rotating Bridgepoint split
Summary
After public comment from school staff and students, the board amended bylaw 9150 to permit nominees in 10th or 11th grade at the time of nomination (so they serve as juniors or seniors) and eliminated a rotating, monthly Bridgepoint split; trustees agreed to implement changes next year to allow time for process adjustments.
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Newark Unified School District board amended proposed changes to the student board representative bylaw (bylaw 9150), expanding nomination eligibility and removing a monthly rotation requirement for Bridgepoint representation.
Sarah Canalis, activities director at Newark Memorial High School, urged the board to keep eligibility open to juniors and seniors and to allow student representatives from Bridgepoint and Newark Memorial to attend meetings rather than rotate monthly. Student speaker Addison told trustees that restricting nominees to 11th graders would reduce opportunities for passionate juniors.
Vice President Jones moved an amendment to permit nominees who are in 10th or 11th grade at the time of nomination (meaning they would serve as a junior or senior) and to eliminate the rotating monthly split that would have required student reps to alternate. The motion also included a staff direction to implement the change in the following year so site processes (election administration and timelines) could be adapted.
Board members debated whether the nomination threshold should be limited to seniors, but several trustees favored allowing 10th graders to run so candidates may serve in the role as juniors or seniors and to broaden opportunities for student leadership. The motion passed on roll call (six yes). The board asked staff to provide implementation guidance and timelines so the next election cycle can reflect the amended eligibility rules.
The board also clarified that, if a student board member cannot fulfill duties during their term, the board may appoint a replacement (consistent with standard board practice) rather than hold a special citywide election.
Trustees and staff agreed the change should be communicated to sites well in advance and scheduled to take effect in the following school year to allow ASB and principals time to adapt nomination calendars and processes.

