Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fence Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board clarifies corner-lot fence options, limits solid fencing to 30%
Summary
Somerville's Planning Board told zoning staff that conditional-use options in the new fence ordinance (items b–h) may be mixed but recommended limiting material changes to no more than two adjacent types; the board also confirmed the 30% cap applies to solid fence length and that a 5-foot picket fence may run the full length when shown on plans.
The Somerville Planning Board on May 13 clarified how the borough’s recently adopted fence ordinance applies to corner lots and the treatment of picket versus solid fencing.
The board was asked by zoning staff whether options listed as items b through h in the ordinance could be combined on a single corner lot and whether a 5-foot picket fence could extend the entire length of a frontage when the ordinance also limits solid fencing to 30% of frontage. Planner Mike, who presented the zoning package and attachments, laid out the two questions and where the ordinance language appears in the board’s packet.
Board members responded that the options may be combined but recommended a practical limit to prevent excessive patchwork of materials. “My recommendation would be a combination of two — no more than two — unless someone seeks a variance for something artistic,” a board member said, explaining that mixing two styles (for example, a more solid rear segment and a picket front) preserves view corridors while allowing privacy where appropriate.
On the 30% solid-fence restriction, the board clarified that the percentage applies specifically to solid fence segments; a 5-foot picket fence may be used for the entire length of a frontage where plans show that configuration. The board asked staff to send a written clarification to the zoning officer so applicants under review receive consistent direction.
A member of the public who said she has an open conditional-use fence application for a corner lot told the board she appreciated the discussion and sought guidance on next steps; the chair said the board could not discuss details of an open application but confirmed the clarifications would help zoning staff advise applicants.
The board did not amend the ordinance during the meeting but directed staff to document the interpretation in writing and to apply a two-option practical limit when advising applicants.
