Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Code Remote Sites topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fernley council approves rule allowing private wells/septic for some remote nonresidential sites; public raises cost concerns
Summary
Council adopted Bill 378 (CA25013) to add definitions for "unserviced" sites and allow private utility facilities (wells/septic) for certain remote nonresidential projects subject to administrative discretion; one public commenter said the draft could create new expensive requirements that keep sites unbuildable, and staff responded the change is intended to simplify waiver requirements.
On Feb. 18 the Fernley City Council adopted a development‑code amendment (Bill 378, CA25013) that creates tailored standards for nonresidential development on remote or "unserviced" sites and permits private utilities where appropriate.
Senior Planner Alisa Johansson told the council the amendment adds a definition for "unserviced" sites (sites not mapped in an adopted area plan and more than one quarter mile from public utility infrastructure) and a definition for "zeroscaping" (landscaping that reduces or eliminates irrigation need). The draft creates a limited set of scaled development standards for landscaping, screening and street improvements on these peripheral sites and, importantly, allows city staff discretion to permit private utility facilities such as wells and septic systems for qualifying developments.
Johansson and staff emphasized the allowance is discretionary and does not expand the types of uses allowed in zoning districts; private facilities must still meet regulatory approvals such as state well standards and septic permitting.
In public comment, Demetri Nicolakis (Value Tainer LLC) said the amendment could “pervert the intent” by adding new, costly requirements—he cited asphalt‑paving costs as an example—and argued the proposed language could leave sites effectively unbuildable. Planning Director Michelle Rambo replied that the amendment is intended to eliminate the need for multiple separate waiver requests by allowing staff to administratively approve scope‑appropriate deviations (for item types such as curb/gutter/sidewalk, parking and utility connections) rather than forcing applicants into a multi‑step waiver process. Rambo said the applicant in a recent waiver case had been given the option to wait for the code update rather than pay the waiver fee.
Council members asked about public safety standards (fire‑department vehicle access and turnarounds) and about how temporary facilities (for example, portable toilets) would relate to building‑code requirements. Staff said projects requiring permanent bathroom facilities would generally need a septic system approved per state rules and that the fire marshal had reviewed access concerns for at least one proposed site and found mitigations appropriate given the site’s intended use. Council approved the amendment 4‑0.
The amendment, staff said, aims to restore peripheral parcels to the city’s developable inventory while preserving administrative controls and regulatory review for safety and environmental compliance.
