Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Helen Cestra introduces herself to council as nominee to Historic Review Commission
Summary
Helen Cestra told council she brings three generations of family real‑estate experience and daily work in Pittsburgh neighborhoods as she seeks confirmation to the Historic Review Commission under Bill 233; councilors asked how she balances preservation with business viability.
Helen Cestra, the administration’s nominee to the Historic Review Commission, told Pittsburgh City Council on March 25 that her background as a third‑generation real‑estate professional gives her a practical perspective on preserving the city’s architectural legacy while allowing neighborhoods to evolve.
“Pittsburgh is a city of extraordinary character,” Cestra said, explaining that her grandparents founded a local real estate company in 1957 and that she has worked day‑to‑day in single‑family and multi‑unit housing across the city. She described stewardship of historic buildings and “bringing people to Pittsburgh, inviting them to invest in its neighborhoods” as central to her work.
Councilwoman Strawberger opened the pre‑agenda interview by asking Cestra to explain how she would balance preservation with new housing needs and commercial vitality. Cestra cited her experience in Lawrenceville, where she said her company established an office to support new development while respecting neighborhood character. “We preserved our history while growing substantially,” she said.
Members pressed her on practical questions. Council members from districts with active commercial corridors raised concerns about how historic guidelines can affect small businesses, including examples where storefront upgrades reportedly conflicted with design standards and led to tenants considering leaving the neighborhood. Cestra said she would prioritize negotiation and problem‑solving: where costs prevent compliance, she suggested exploring exemptions, phased timelines or supplemental funding to keep businesses from leaving.
Members also asked how she would handle nominations of structures that property owners oppose. Cestra said she would first seek to understand the historic criteria and “show the owner that there is value” to designation, while recognizing owners’ financial concerns.
The clerk read the title of Bill 233 appointing Cestra to a term expiring Jan. 1, 2028; the pre‑agenda interview concluded with councilors thanking the nominee. The nomination was introduced; no final committee vote on the appointment appears in this pre‑agenda interview record.
What’s next: Bill 233 was read on the pre‑agenda and the nomination proceeds to committee and possible confirmation at a future council meeting.
