Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

College Park presents FY27 budget proposal with no tax-rate increase; council weighs new positions and capital needs

Mayor and Council of College Park · April 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City Manager Kenny Young presented a FY27 budget that holds property tax rates steady (residential 335, commercial 385), shows a $1.7 million (5.6%) revenue increase, and funds several new positions and CIP items; council asked staff to return with a worksheet of adjustment requests before ordinance introduction.

Mayor and Council of College Park convened a budget work session on April 11 to review the city manager's proposed fiscal 2027 spending plan. City Manager Kenny Young and finance staff outlined a largely balanced proposal that does not raise property tax rates — maintaining the residential rate at 335 and the commercial rate at 385 — while adding funding for several new positions and capital projects.

The proposed budget projects $1.7 million (about 5.6%) of higher general fund revenue compared with the current year, with property tax remaining the largest single source (general property tax budgeted at $16.3 million). Debt service payments total about $1.46 million; the city plans a general-fund transfer of $1.29 million combined with parking revenue to cover the balance. Personnel costs are the largest expenditure driver, reflecting wage adjustments and new staffing requests.

Young and Finance staff reviewed a set of position requests included in the draft: a full-time housing project manager to be placed in economic development, a recreation coordinator to support programming at the newly improved Duval Field, an engineering technician for public works, conversion of a halftime emergency support specialist in Youth & Family Services to a full-time position, and a part‑time bus operator for senior transportation. The housing manager was estimated at roughly $110,000 for a full year; staff said the FY27 budget currently funds a half‑year and offered cost estimates if council wished to accelerate hiring.

Council members pressed staff on several operating details: a $36,080 cost shift to the city to replace federal grant funding for the regional mass-notification system (COG); a reduced net convenience‑fee offset after lower-than-projected credit-card convenience revenues; and contingency set aside of $125,000 for unplanned events. Multiple councilors asked administration to produce a short, itemized worksheet of possible adjustments and additions so council could decide which items to carry into the formal ordinance.

What happens next: staff asked councilors to submit written adjustment requests so administration could prepare a consolidated worksheet before the ordinance is introduced. The city manager outlined the calendar for the ordinance introduction and public hearing leading up to final adoption in May. The council scheduled a follow-up work session to consider specific additions and tradeoffs.