Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Aurora officials lay out 2026 budget; warn of rising health-insurance and water-system costs
Summary
Village staff presented a preliminary 2026 budget overview to the Committee of the Whole, highlighting pay adjustments, steep health-insurance increases, a proposed public-works operations assistant via staff reallocation, and major long-term water-system capital needs estimated at $100–$125 million.
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Village of North Aurora Committee of the Whole received an initial review of the 2026 budget on March 2, with staff flagging rising personnel costs, steep health-insurance increases and major water-system capital needs that could affect future rates.
Jason, a village staff member who presented the overview, said personnel costs will include pay adjustments effective June 1 — public works and police sergeants 3.25%, police officers 4.5% and non-union employees 3.0% — and projected a blended retirement (IMRF) budget assumption of about 10.28% after factoring a possible IMRF increase to 11%. He told the board that health-insurance premiums are a “major budget pressure,” reporting that “HMO is up 19.7%” and that high-deductible plans are “up 21.7%.”
To improve operations without increasing net headcount, staff proposed creating a Public Works Operations Assistant by reallocating existing positions: moving the utility-billing specialist into public works, backfilling the utility role at the front desk, and converting a part-time accounting assistant to full time — a net increase of roughly 0.3 FTE in the budget. Jason said the position would centralize resident communications, training schedules, records and EPA-related tasks.
On debt and capital, Jason said the village carries about $15.7 million in outstanding bonds and expects roughly $1.7 million in principal and interest next year. He said the village awaits decisions on potential low- or no-interest EPA loans for water capital projects (not yet awarded) and may need alternate revenue bonds if grants are not approved.
The water fund drew particular attention: Jason said the water-master plan is concluding and will inform future rate recommendations but warned of large long-term needs. “Over the next 25 years we have an estimated $100 to $125 million worth of upgrades that have to go into the system,” he said, adding that an IEPA-required corrosion-control study (roughly $450,000 capital and about $50,000 annual operating costs thereafter) is mandatory even if all lead service lines are removed.
Other budget notes included projected general-fund revenue of about $7.5 million (sales tax remaining the largest revenue source, up roughly $150,000 or 2% year over year), continued capital spending such as a $2.1 million 2026 road program, a veterans memorial phase one carryover (~$700,000), and vehicle and equipment requests (three outfitted police squads, water truck, audio-visual upgrades).
Jason also summarized TIF activity, saying the Route 31 TIF is scheduled for dissolution later this year and staff will recommend an ordinance to close it; United TIF revenue was projected at about $1.6 million with significant rebate and project set-asides.
The draft budget will be posted before the March 6 meeting for public review. Staff plans deeper departmental presentations at committee meetings in April, a public hearing on April 20 and final adoption at the May 4 meeting if the schedule holds.
The Committee permitted the presentation to conclude without a vote on the budget itself; the board will return for further review and potential amendments as numbers and grant decisions are finalized.

