Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Home Occupation Little Critters topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sunbury commission splits 3–3 on in-home pet-sitting permit; motion fails

City of Sunbury Planning and Zoning Commission · March 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning & Zoning Commission voted March 23 on a home-occupation certificate for Little Critters Pet Sitters (125 Harrison St.). A motion to approve the applicant packet (which included a 10-client-dog limit) failed 3–3; commissioners instructed staff to prioritize zoning-code review of home-occupation language.

The Sunbury Planning & Zoning Commission deadlocked 3–3 on March 23 over whether a home-occupation certificate should be issued to Little Critters Pet Sitters LLC at 125 Harrison Street.

Staff told the commission the applicant had supplied neighbor letters requested at a prior meeting, with the immediate west neighbor (133 Harrison) not providing a letter. Commissioners debated whether the home-occupation ordinance, written primarily for professional offices, appropriately covers in-home pet care.

One commissioner said the submission proposed "a limit of 10 client dogs as well as six personal dogs," and several colleagues said numerical caps should be set only where grounded in code language or objective metrics, like required square footage. A motion to approve the certificate as submitted—reflecting the applicant's packet including a 10-dog limit—was made and seconded. Roll call yielded yes votes from Mrs. Miller, Mr. Palma and Mrs. Stark, and no votes from Mayor St. John, Mr. Long and Mr. Soldman, so the motion failed.

City staff clarified that, because the commission is constrained by current code language for home occupations, the better remedy is to update zoning language rather than unilaterally impose conditions the code does not expressly permit. Commissioners directed staff to place home-occupation code revision on the zoning-code review list and to return with recommended language that could address pet-based home businesses.

Next steps: The applicant may amend the application if she wishes to reduce the requested limits. The commission did not grant the certificate at this meeting; staff will return to the commission when the code review or any new application proceeds.