Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the SPCC And Fueling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marina told to update SPCC plan and secure fire permits before fueling at 51 Water Street
Summary
Commissioners pressed a marina applicant to update an out-of-date SPCC (spill prevention) plan and obtain local fire-department permits before dispensing fuel; applicant said it will retain a consultant and expects an updated plan before fueling begins, and the commission attached conditions to minimize spill risk.
Members of the Newburyport Conservation Commission raised repeated concerns about spill preparedness on a proposed fuel-dispensing installation at 51 Water Street, and they made completion and review of an updated SPCC (spill prevention, control and countermeasure) plan a condition of future fuel operations.
Paul Avery (project representative) and Chris (marina representative) described plans for two above-ground fuel tanks and said the operator had retained a consultant to update the SPCC and related documents. Commissioners and staff responded that the publicly filed SPCC was out of date—contact names and vendors were obsolete following last year’s release—and that the plan should be revised and reviewed prior to dispensing. "It would be important to have the SPCC completed before you dispense fuel there," Chris said. The applicant said the updated plan will be completed before fueling and that dock installation timing makes immediate dispensing unlikely.
Commission members focused on operational details that affect response and protect the river: adequate access for spill-response equipment, whether piping layout could impede cleanup access, secondary containment or double-wall tanks, alarm systems, training and documented procedures, and updated contact and contractor information in the SPCC. Barb Riley and others stressed that an outdated plan can hamstring an effective response—"if you're calling an entity that doesn't exist, that is a problem," one commissioner said—and asked the applicant to confirm updated procedures and contractor contacts.
Halras Equipment Company representative Michael Tras described design measures (NFPA 30 compliance, separated tank valves and serviceable piping) intended to limit risk and facilitate visual inspection. The commission discussed whether a combined tank capacity crosses state thresholds that trigger additional permitting; staff said the project is subject to SPCC requirements and that the consultant preparing the plan will clarify whether additional state permitting is required.
The commission closed the public hearing and issued permits for associated work while reserving the right to require the finalized SPCC plan and related documentation prior to starting fuel-dispensing operations. Commissioners also requested evidence of local fire-department coordination, staging plans for removal/installation of underground tanks, and soil/groundwater testing procedures tied to tank removal. The board’s motion to issue the permit package carried by recorded vote, with conditions requiring the updated SPCC and specified safety and monitoring steps before dispensing begins.
Next steps: Applicant to provide the updated SPCC plan, demonstrate secondary containment and emergency contact lists, and secure required fire-department permits prior to opening for fuel service.
