Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cultural Stewardship topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Royal mausoleum stewardship sparks cultural debate; lawmakers consider a commission of lineal descendants and societies
Summary
Witnesses split over how to steward Mauna ʻAla: some lineal descendants and royal societies urged a commission made up of named societies and descendants; others opposed legislative specification and urged resolving DNR hiring controversies first.
The committee devoted extensive time to SB 3247, a measure proposing a temporary working group (later revised toward a commission) to provide recommendations on stewardship, cultural protocols, and repairs at the royal mausoleum (Mauna ʻAla).
Royal societies, lineal descendants and cultural organizations described deep, long-running concerns about past decisions, the need to respect lineage, and the central role of kahu (caretakers). Leomi Khan of the Aahui Pu said the measure gives an opportunity "to work in partnership with the state to ensure that the stewardship of Mauna ʻAla is done properly, grounded in cultural protocol." Quentyn Quanoa and James Moho, representing royal-house descendant interests, urged an empowered body with voting members nominated by traditional organizations and lineal families.
Several organizations, including Daughters and Sons of Hawaiian Warriors and others, opposed the bill's then-current structure, arguing the DNR hiring controversy from 2024 had not been resolved and that private cultural protocols and lineage determinations should not be subject to an oversized statutory working group. Opponents asked the legislature to pause and allow customary processes and legal questions to be addressed before creating a statutory body.
The chair proposed a compromise that narrows membership, recognizes the kahu as the individual responsible for cultural and spiritual care, and makes the DLNR chair an ex-officio nonvoting participant while reserving voting seats for named royal societies and lineal descendant representatives; the committee advanced the bill with these membership and structure changes.
The testimony was frequently emotional and centered on restoring trust, clarifying process for appointment of caretakers, and ensuring meaningful cultural consultation. The committee’s amendments reflect an effort to balance institutional oversight with the prerogatives of royal societies and descendants; additional drafting is expected to refine nomination processes and dispute-resolution mechanisms.
The measure will proceed with the revised membership and additional clarifying amendments about responsibilities and funding.
