Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears extensive testimony on mandatory cat sterilization bill; decision deferred
Summary
HB1736, which would create a spay/neuter special fund and require sterilization of cats over five months, drew hundreds of written submissions and contrasting testimony from conservation, animal‑welfare and breeder representatives; the committee deferred decision making for more work.
HB1736, a proposal to create a spay and neuter special fund and mandate sterilization of cats older than five months (with limited exceptions), drew lengthy and often divided testimony at the AEN/HOU joint hearing.
The Department of Land and Natural Resources said it supported measures in the bill that advance sterilization and invasive‑species protections. The Hawaii Humane Society and Pacific Pet Alliance described collaboration during drafting; Stephanie Kendrick of the Hawaii Humane Society said the measure balances conservation and animal‑welfare interests and that a $100 intact‑animal declaration fee would not be an undue burden for responsible breeders. Grant Sizemore of the American Bird Conservancy testified that required sterilization of pet cats was necessary to protect vulnerable wildlife.
Opponents and practitioners cautioned that mandatory sterilization without robust, affordable access could backfire. Vivian Tolner, a volunteer with Pet Fix Hawaii, noted the cost barrier and urged simplicity and funding for no‑cost clinics, saying Pet Fix had completed over 1,000 sterilizations in a year. Other speakers warned that mandates could increase shelter intake if owners cannot afford procedures. Pacific Pet Alliance said it supported the special fund but opposed the mandatory elements as drafted.
Committee members raised enforcement and logistics concerns, including veterinarian availability on neighbor islands, funding needs for statewide enforcement, and whether DLNR could administer or contract for services. DLNR said enforcement would require additional funding and likely third‑party contracting to ensure a steady stream of veterinarians.
Ending: After extensive oral and written testimony (the committee recorded hundreds of written submissions), the committee deferred decision‑making on HB1736 to allow additional stakeholder consultation and follow‑up on funding and enforcement details.
