Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Funding 911 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances change to 911 fee schedule after extensive testimony from technicians and directors
Summary
A proposal to raise the statewide 911 device fee from $1.50 to $1.86 and shift an implementation date attracted lengthy technical testimony about reserves, contract costs and NG911 upgrades; the committee voted to send the measure to Finance, Ways and Means (13–6–1).
Representative Carriger placed amendment 015602 on Senate Joint Resolution 0048 and described the measure’s purpose to shore up 911 funding. Local 911 professionals and the Tennessee Emergency Communications Board members testified at the committee’s request about the rationale for the proposed rate increase.
Brad Anders, executive director of the Knox County 911 District, and Curtis Sutton, executive director of the Tennessee Emergency Communications Board, explained that rising equipment, contract and operating costs and the need to avoid financial distress in some districts motivated the board’s recommendation. Sutton and other witnesses said the board’s deliberations considered inflation and a market-tested comparison rate; committee testimony referenced a projected statewide revenue increase of roughly $36 million and a proposed per‑device fee increase from $1.50 to $1.86.
Members pressed witnesses on reserve balances, accounting for restricted vs. unrestricted reserves, whether all districts have a present need for additional funds, and how Tennessee’s rate would rank nationally. Witnesses said some districts earmark reserves for capital projects with multi‑year replacement cycles; proponents argued a timely rate increase would avoid future distress while opponents characterized the increase as regressive and unnecessary given existing reserves.
After extended questioning and brief recesses for additional witnesses, the committee voted to move SJ 0048 to Finance, Ways and Means by a vote of 13 ayes, six noes and one present not voting. The resolution, if enacted, would change the date and rate details subject to further review at Finance, Ways and Means.
