Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wildlife Hunting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves bill clarifying that wildlife commission governs firearm discharge while hunting; cities raised local-control concerns

Tennessee House of Representatives · March 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers passed a bill (substitute SB2028/HB2017) clarifying the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Commission’s authority over hunting and firearm discharge while lawfully hunting; city attorneys and police chiefs said the bill would limit local nuisance regulation, while sponsors cited attorney-general opinions asserting state supremacy.

The House passed Senate Bill 2028 (substituted for House Bill 2017) to clarify that the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Commission has authority to prescribe hunting methods and to govern the discharge of firearms while lawfully hunting.

Representative Cochran, the sponsor, said the bill "simply clarifies what numerous attorney generals have understood for many years" and that the Commission has primary authority over hunting regulations. Opponents, including representatives relaying testimony from city attorneys and police chiefs, said the measure would remove local governments’ ability to address nuisance hunting — such as outside hunters coming into residential areas, leaving shell casings and disturbing neighborhoods early in the morning.

During debate the sponsor read portions of prior attorney-general opinions and the House considered committee amendment three, which added an exception clarifying that counties and municipalities may regulate the discharge of a firearm by a person lawfully hunting within 500 feet of school property, aligning the code with other provisions. That amendment was adopted. Sponsors repeatedly emphasized that reckless discharge remains subject to local criminal enforcement.

Supporters said the bill preserves hunting regulations under state authority; opponents warned it could preempt many local ordinances unless the legislation and existing AG opinions are carefully interpreted. The final bill passed on third reading.