Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consumer Markets topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances ticketing reforms to Judiciary after contested hearing over price caps and transparency
Summary
A bill requiring price-disclosure and capping secondary resale prices (proposed 15% above face value) drew competing testimony: venues and independent-venue associations urged caps to protect fans and local businesses, while resale marketplaces and consumer groups warned caps could increase fraud and push transactions into unregulated channels. The committee moved House File 4050 to Judiciary.
Representative Koegel introduced House File 4050, a proposal to expand price transparency in primary listings and to cap resale prices at 15% above face value (all-in). The sponsor framed the bill as a consumer-protection measure to prevent deceptive marketplace practices and protect fans and local venues.
"We want to make sure that Minnesotans deserve to go out and have a little fun," the sponsor said, arguing that transparency and a cap can stop extreme price gouging that leaves many fans priced out of local events.
Venue operators, promoters and the National Independent Venue Association testified in favor. Adrianna Courts-Bruce, senior director of ticketing at First Avenue, described instances where secondary-market listings were hundreds of dollars above face value and said fraudulent listings frequently left fans locked out at venue doors. "We have stories upon stories of young fans showing up at the doors with fraudulent tickets, heartbroken that they were scammed," she said.
Opponents — including the Ticket Policy Forum, StubHub and the Sports Fans Coalition — warned that price caps would push buyers and sellers to informal or unregulated channels (social media, private sales), increase fraud and be difficult for platforms to enforce because marketplaces may not be able to determine reliably an original face value for every ticket. StubHub's representative said many resale transactions provide consumer protections and access that would be diminished if platforms are forced out of the regulated market.
Committee members asked about carve-outs for season-ticket and large-scale professional events and raised doubts about price caps' effectiveness. Representative Koegel said the bill exempted certain subscription/season-ticket businesses and that she planned to continue refining the measure in Judiciary. The committee voted to move House File 4050 to the Judiciary Committee for further work.
The hearing captured a wide range of witnesses on both sides of the policy question: fans and small-venue operators pressing for consumer protections and marketplace companies warning of unintended consequences, including increased fraud and enforcement challenges.
