Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Proceedings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee conducts language review on multiple bills including LD695, LD2092 and LD2042
Summary
After the LD1004 vote the State and Local Government Committee reviewed committee amendments and draft language for a set of bills (LD695, LD2092, LD2009, LD2148, LD1969, LD2214 and LD2042), discussed pending fiscal notes and technical cross-references, and set processes for language review distribution.
Following the LD1004 proceeding, committee staff led a sequence of language reviews and clarifications on a portfolio of bills.
LD695: Staff summarized the committee amendment for LD695 (sponsored by Senator Pur) and noted three reports on the table — a majority report and two minority reports — and that some placeholder fiscal language remains in the draft. Committee members were shown appended sponsor amendments and proposed minority amendments.
LD2092: The committee reviewed LD2092 (updates to information-technology and cybersecurity terminology). Staff noted a majority 'ought to pass as amended' report with line-by-line markups from Deputy Commissioner Trundy serving as the drafting basis.
LD2009: The bill originally would have allowed a political subdivision to enter federal bankruptcy proceedings; the committee amendment reworked title and scope and staff noted that fiscal analysis remains pending and the committee clarified they removed an emergency preamble in the committee amendment.
LD2148: Members reviewed a committee amendment adjusting the state employee health insurance premium cap provision and discussed changing a 10% figure to 6% in committee draft language; staff said any returned fiscal note would convert an 'ought to pass' into an 'ought to pass as amended' report as needed.
LD1969: Staff presented the treasurer's bill and flagged two technical clarifications (a cross-reference that omits the words "bank account" and whether a change in wording from "physical communication" to "paper communication" changes implementation). Staff will share the draft with the treasurer's office and return any required language changes to the committee.
LD2214: Committee reviewed a boundary-confirmation bill for municipalities and added an emergency preamble as a committee amendment; members confirmed the chaptered law would include original bill data.
LD2042: Committee reviewed an agreed-upon committee amendment to eliminate certain newspaper-publication requirements for municipalities; members noted the amendment was a partial step toward the original bill's intent and that future legislation could follow.
Process and logistics: Staff (Kristen and Sophie) described timelines for electronic language review and committed to providing printed packets and putting materials on members' desks on session days. Several members requested colored or printed copies to support caucus review. Staff will circulate final drafts and any fiscal notes when they are available.
Quoted from the meeting: Sophie (staff) — "this is the committee amendment"; Kristen (analyst) — "I will work with Sophie, get some items passed out for the committee's review."
