Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Finance Taxation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee amends LD1004 to add LD15, delays camper-trailer excise tax until Jan. 1, 2027
Summary
The State and Local Government Committee voted 7–2 on March 19 to pass LD1004 as amended to include LD15 and change the camper-trailer excise tax start date to Jan. 1, 2027, after members raised concerns about mid-year tax changes and municipal administrative burdens.
Get email alerts on the State Finance Taxation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On March 19, 2026 the State and Local Government Committee voted 7–2 to report LD1004 "ought to pass as amended" after adding LD15, a provision that moves the effective date of the camper-trailer excise tax to Jan. 1, 2027.
Representative Griema told the committee LD15 — an excise tax on tow-behind camper trailers enacted in chaptered law with an originally printed effective date of Jan. 1, 2026 — was held by the governor and therefore would not practically take effect until 90 days after adjournment, which would place its effective date in mid-July. She warned that the mid-year start could force municipalities to collect the higher pre-change rates for registrations made before the new date and that "there's no mechanism" for towns to refund overpayments if the tax rate changes mid-year. "If you register your camper before the new effective date, you're paying the old rate, which could be thousands of dollars," Griema said.
The committee reviewed registration data provided by the Secretary of State's office (as relayed in committee discussion) showing most camper registrations occur before July; the transcript records that "all but about 2,500" 2026 registrations occur before that mid-year date. After debate about administrative disruption for town clerks and consistency with other tax changes, Senator Joseph Martin moved to include LD15 in the committee amendment and to set the tax's effective date to Jan. 1, 2027. A member seconded the motion on the floor and the committee discussed minor drafting clarifications to be resolved in language review.
The roll-call recorded in the transcript shows the following votes: Representative Will Tulle — yes; Representative Adams — no; Representative Kimberly Pomemelo — no; Representative Randy Greenwood — yes; Representative Sue Salsbury — yes; Senator Joseph Martin — yes; Representative Lynn Copelan — yes; Representative Dave Rollins — yes; Representative Wayne Faren — yes. The clerk announced "seven in favor of the motion and two opposed," and the clerk recorded the report as "ought to pass as amended."
Why it matters: committee members said a Jan. 1 effective date avoids mid-year administrative complexity for town offices and the Secretary of State's registration systems. Analysts told the committee they would tidy cross-reference dates and any annual-reporting language in language review.
What happens next: staff said technical language changes would be handled in language review and in any later drafting steps; the committee will distribute updated packets and fiscal notes as they become available.
Quoted from the meeting: Representative Griema — "it could be thousands of dollars... there's no mechanism to do that"; Senator Martin — "That's a motion" (to extend the start date to January 1, 2027). The committee asked analysts to make consistent edits during language review and acknowledged the sponsor's objection to changing a chaptered law's dates, while concluding the administrative concerns warranted the amendment.
The committee moved on to language review items after recording the vote.

