Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Newburyport school budget rises as special-education and out-of-district costs balloon
Summary
School staff presented a $47.8 million FY27 draft budget requiring a $41.5 million city appropriation (about a 5.2% increase). Officials warned out-of-district placements and special-education costs — including seven projected residential placements at roughly $390,000 each — are the main drivers and noted limited local revenue growth under Proposition 2½.
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Newburyport City School Committee reviewed an updated FY27 draft budget on March 11, 2026, that would increase total spending to $47.8 million — a $3.2 million (7.3%) rise from level service — and require a city appropriation of about $41.5 million, or roughly a 5.2% increase.
Mr. Manning, presenting the draft, said, "The current budget is a $47.8 million budget, which is a $3.2 million or 7.3% increase. It would require a city appropriation of 41.5 million which is a $2 million increase or approximately 5.2%." He and other staff emphasized that much of the growth is driven by special-education expenses and out-of-district placements.
Staff projected 34 out-of-district placements for FY27, including seven residential placements. "The average cost for one of those" residential placements, Mr. Manning said, "is approximately $390,000," a figure the committee flagged as a central budget pressure.
To close gaps, the presentation outlined a mix of adjustments: staffing reallocations, attrition savings, enrollment-driven shifts, and one-time use of school-choice fund balance. The school-choice fund has been used as a contingency; staff said the district took approximately $400,000 of one-time school-choice reserves in the current iteration and currently estimates next-year school-choice receipts near $1.5 million (the packet showed roughly $1.2 million received in the current year).
Officials also updated projected state receipts. The district adjusted its circuit-breaker (special-education reimbursement) estimate to about $2.85 million and described that figure as conservative.
Committee members focused several questions on long-term revenue constraints. Mr. Manning and other speakers noted the limits of local revenue under Proposition 2½ and the importance of state-level relief for structural funding problems, including Chapter 70 and unrestricted general government aid.
On options to lower costs, staff described ongoing work to develop more in-district special-education programs, share transportation arrangements with neighboring districts, and continue district-level cost reviews. The superintendent said leaders will hold a special-education budget summit and meet with program leaders to examine contract services and transportation and to identify opportunities to reduce reliance on high-cost out-of-district placements.
What happens next: staff will return with a recommended preliminary budget at the March 25 meeting, followed by a public hearing and proposed budget adoption at the April 29 meeting.

