Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sunbury council approves Ker Crossing plat, Little Walnut Creek interceptor contract and other routine infrastructure items
Summary
The Sunbury City Council unanimously approved the Ker Crossing final plat, awarded a wastewater interceptor contract to Dirt Dog Excavating for a $591,000 bid (with a 10% contingency noted), and passed multiple resolutions and second‑reading items tied to GIS services, street improvements and professional contracts.
The Sunbury City Council on May 6 approved a package of infrastructure and administrative items, including a final plat, contract awards and service agreements.
Key votes at the meeting:
- Ker Crossing, Section Two (Ordinance 2026.08): Council approved the final plat for the Ker Crossing development (third reading). Roll‑call votes were unanimous among the members present.
- Little Walnut Creek Interceptor Phase 2A (Ordinance 2026.09): The council awarded the Phase 2A contract to Dirt Dog Excavating LLC of Ashland, Ohio. The advertised bid was recorded at $591,000; council discussion noted a 10% contingency that brings the project budget to approximately $660,000.
- GIS administration and support (Resolution 2026.11): Council approved a resolution to contract for Geographic Information Systems administration and support services (vendor referenced as Map Del in the packet and services committee report).
Other business included second‑reading and first‑reading items on the agenda: a contract modification with Accenture for wastewater treatment plant expansion inspection and administration (resolution/second reading), a $1.3 million city street‑improvement contract to Decker Construction (second reading), and a franchise agreement discussion with Ohio Power Company (AEP) that remains under consideration in committee. Several tabled resolutions were taken off the table and passed by unanimous roll call.
All recorded roll‑call votes shown in the meeting transcript were recorded as unanimous among the six voting council members present. No motions failed on the items discussed. The meeting closed with an approved motion to adjourn.
