Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission finds multiple City of Tampa land‑development code amendments consistent
Summary
The Hillsborough County City/County Planning Commission on April 13 unanimously found several City of Tampa land‑development code (LDC) text amendments consistent with the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, including a council‑initiated increase to Channel District height/FAR rules and several staff‑proposed streamlining changes.
The Hillsborough County City/County Planning Commission on April 13 voted unanimously to find multiple City of Tampa land‑development code amendments consistent with the Tampa Comprehensive Plan.
City planner Eric Cotton told the commission the most significant council‑initiated change would allow building heights in the Channel District to rise to whatever the Federal Aviation Administration and applicable height approvals permit, and would increase the maximum floor‑area ratio (FAR) in part of Channelside from 3.5 to 10.5. "Right now the code limits to 175 feet," Cotton said; under the proposal that limit would shift to FAA/CHA height allowances.
Planning Commission staff recommended the package be found consistent, saying the changes would streamline development review and align with urban‑village and infill goals. "The comprehensive plan supports development within urban villages that increase residential density," Emily Phelan, Planning Commission staff, told commissioners.
Commissioners also considered a set of staff‑proposed text updates arising from state law changes: administrative plat approvals, an explicit plat review active period, and codification of long‑standing administrative zoning covenant practices. Commissioner Linkous moved to find the council‑initiated text amendment consistent; Commissioner Jemison seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
In the same hearing the commission approved findings of consistency for other Tampa code updates: changes to subdivision procedures (Article II, Division 8, Chapter 27) to reflect new plat rules; removal of a decades‑old special street frontage setback (sec. 27‑160) that staff said was no longer needed given multimodal mobility priorities; and housekeeping edits to use tables to incorporate a state‑defined "certified recovery residence" classification. Commissioners asked staff clarifying questions about how the changes would interact with existing setbacks and eminent‑domain procedures.
The commission’s action is a recommendation; city council will consider formal adoption and any implementing ordinance language.
What happens next: the package returns to the City of Tampa for any subsequent hearings or ordinances; staff said some changes reflect state preemption and are largely administrative in nature.
